Saturday, January 21, 2017

Prometheus Trust Conference: “Deep Philosophy, Deep Ecology”




“Deep Philosophy, Deep Ecology”
Philosophy in the west – especially in its English-speaking part – has been considered an isolated and private venture, with little influence upon the way in which societies conduct themselves: like Earth itself in the Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy, its description hovers between “harmless” and “mostly harmless”.  But is this really the case?  Can we trace today’s ecological crisis to the philosophy (or philosophies) adopted consciously or unconsciously in recent centuries?  Perhaps the errors embedded within it are now revealed as very far from harmless – in fact a flawed philosophy may be the most toxic thing known to humankind.

Deep ecology – the view that solutions to the ecological crisis are to be found in a radical revision of humankind’s understanding of itself, the world in which it lives, and their mutual relation – has much to be commended.  Deep ecologists argue that superficial changes in patterns of consumption while we retain an underlying view that we are set apart as the active and rational rulers and consumers of an irrational and passive world of materiality will not solve our ecological crisis.

But if we are to reject an inadequate philosophical worldview, how are we to find a better and more truthful one?  Can we find a philosophy from which a truly wide-ranging justice can emerge?  Perhaps we must wipe the philosophical slate clean and start again from the very beginning, or perhaps we may find in neglected philosophies from our past the key to the righting of relations between ourselves and the rest of reality.  This is a challenge we cannot ignore without the gravest consequences to ourselves and our fellow companions on Earth.  But although the task is great, the rewards of success are also great: it may be that a philosophy which addresses the needs of deep ecology will also contribute to the solution of other more purely human problems which now press upon us.

This notice represents a call for papers and presentations on this theme from all those interested in the subject, from whatever background or discipline – academic and non-academic, specialist and non-specialist.

Abstracts should be no more than 300 words and should be sent to at the latest by Friday, 7 April 2017.  Acceptance of these will be confirmed as quickly as possible.  

Papers should be around 2500-3000 words or 20 minutes’ presentation (we usually allow a further 15-20 minutes for a question and answer session after each presentation).

Bookings should be received by us not later than Saturday, 29 April 2017.

The Trustees are delighted to announce that the Thomas Taylor Lecture will be given by Professor Kevin Corrigan.  The keynote speaker is yet to be arranged.

The formal conference begins with a keynote address on the Friday evening (the 7th) but we hope to arrange a "round table" day on the Friday for those able to attend - and overnight accommodation will be available on the Thursday 6th.  A round table day will, we hope, enable those who would like to make a contribution to the general discussion to do so without going through the process of producing a formal paper.  Do write and tell us if this is of interest to you. 

Saturday, October 15, 2016

CFP: Otherwise than the Binary: Towards Feminist Reading of Ancient Greek Philosophy, Magic and Mystery Traditions

A now common critique of the Western philosophical tradition is that it harbors an inherent sexism wherein “universal reason” is far from neutral but is, rather, positively viewed as masculine, setting itself over against the feminine domain of unreason, madness and mystery. Theorists like Genevieve Lloyd have argued that Greek modes of thought, particularly Pythagorean and Platonic, insofar as they appear to privilege identity over difference, the Limit over the Unlimited, the One over the Many, logos over pathos, the intelligible over the bodily, etc., all harbor and reinforce a gendered hierarchy. To be sure, the overall goal of this volume will be to examine whether or not the Greek worldview neatly falls within this “phallologocentric” tradition. Are there ways of thinking antiquity differently, namely, as a expounding and celebrating philosophies of difference and possibly complementary to feminism's concern with the overcoming of traditional and patriarchal metaphysics?

Despite the tradition of representing Greeks as a world of sober rationality, scholars like Dodds, Rohde, Onians, Vernant, and Detienne challenged this model by emphasizing the 'irrational' aspects of Ancient Greek thought and practice. For example, Parmenides, a philosopher who is lauded as the ‘father of logic’ expresses his philosophy in an esoteric poem that describes his experience in meeting a goddess. Socrates, in the Phaedrus, praises love as a kind of divine madness. In recent years, issues of gender in the Ancient Greek world are of crucial significance to our understanding of the culture of the time, providing necessary context for our reception of core philosophical texts. The work of feminist pioneers in classics, such as Nicole Loraux and Froma Zeitlin, has sparked a continuing discussion of how gender constructions in the Ancient Greek world shaped the philosophical ideas that continue to persist in our contemporary philosophical discussions.

We invite analyses on topics that engage with Greek philosophy, magic, mystery traditions in relationship to questioning the classical representations of gender, where it often falls on a neat binary in which the masculine is privileged. The final volume will be designed to reflect as many different topics as possible, including but not limited to: Pythagorean tradition, sacred geometry, Platonism, Neoplatonists such as Plotinus and Iamblichus, mystery traditions and rituals such as the Thesmophoria and other Ancient Greek festivals, Theurgy, The Eleusinian MysteriesDionysian practices, divination, curse tablets, sorcery, Orphic traditions, Presocratics such as Heraclitus, Parmenides, and Empedocles, Hekate, and the magical papyri.

Please send a 300-500 word abstract to by February 1, 2017.

Include your name, affiliation, and a brief biography in the accompanying email. If your abstract is accepted, finished articles will be due by Nov. 15, 2017.

Please direct any inquiries about the project to the editors at their institutional addresses, provided below.

Dr. Danielle A. Layne, Philosophy Department, Gonzaga University,
Dr. Jessica Elbert Decker, Philosophy Department, CSU San Marcos,

Monday, May 2, 2016

Bibliography of Great Women Scholars (for Cameo)

Great Women Scholars of Alchemy, Magic, and Esotericism

Frances Yates, Giordano Bruno and the Hermetic Tradition
Allison Coudert, Religion, Magic, and Science in Early Modern Europe and America
Hillary Gatti, Giordano Bruno and Renaissance Science
Deborah Harkness, John Dee's Conversations with Angels: Cabala, Alchemy, and the End of Nature
Pamela Smith, The Body of the Artisan
Claire Fanger, Conjuring Spirits + Invoking Angels
Margaret Jacob, The Radical Enlightenment: Pantheists, Freemasons and Republicans
Marsha Keith Schuchard, Emanuel Swedenborg, Secret Agent on Earth and in Heaven
Paula Findlen, Possessing Nature
Tara Nummedal, Alchemy and Authority in the Holy Roman Empire
Jenny Rampling (editor of Ambix, papers at
Anke Timmermann, Verse and Transmutation: A Corpus of Middle English Alchemical Poetry
Meredith K. Ray, Daughters of Alchemy
Sara Abel Rappe, Reading Neoplatonism
Ruth Majercik, The Chaldaean Oracles
Sienna Latham (MA thesis on women alchemists)
Sasha Chaitow (MA thesis on Atalanta Fugiens)
Emma Clark (et al.) Iamblichus, De Mysteriis
Sarah Klitenic Wear (with John Dillon), Dionysius the Areopagite and the Neoplatonist Tradition
Pauliina Remes, Neoplatonism
Rebecca Lesses, Ritual Practices to Gain Power
Naomi Janowitz, Icons of Power